• Home
  • Reviews
  • Essays
  • Wimsey
  • Fiction
  • Bio

What is this?
It's Bill Peschel's professional and personal home on the web. Welcome. Poke around in the drawers and cupboards. There's a lot of interesting stuff here.
What's the Reader's Almanac?
It's my 2008-2009 nonfiction book project. A year's worth of entertaining and thought-provoking stories and anecdotes about writers and their books, tied to the day they occurred. Published regularly. Here's a list of the essays published so far.
Why is it on the web?
I don't have an agent or a contract, so this is my way of building an audience, and seeing if there's any interest in the book. The daily deadlines don't hurt, either.
Are you going to write anything else here?
Sure. The occasional book review, a collection of links to neat articles and websites, and my opinions. You know, the usual stuff you find on the web.

Recent Reader's Almanac Posts
Saturday Literature Links
Thoreau makes an ash of himself (1844)
Dickens leaves the United States, gratefully (1842)
Uprisings and Downfalls: Troy, Sherlock Holmes, the Irish Rebellion and Brendan Behan
A Merry Shakespeare (1597)
Petrarch: Just one look (1327)
Writers at Play: Brendan Behan and Jackie Gleason
Writers at Rest: Henry James


Recent Reviews
The Unscratchables. Cornelius Kane.

Pim & Francie: The Golden Bear Days. Al Columbia.
Mostly Harmless. Douglas Adams.
Mr. Monk and the Dirty Cop. Lee Goldberg.

Search


Advanced Search


<< Weird Crimes In Fremont | Home | Last Post for 2005 >>

January 01, 2006

Review FAQ


Q. What's this score thingy about?

A: It's an objective measurement of a subjective opinion. The PeschelScore(tm) began as a way for me to figure out what I liked and disliked about a novel. So far, it seems to work.

A book is scored in six categories, each from 1 to 15 points. A seventh "bonus points" category can add another 10. That lets me add points for extremely subjective cases: creating memorable scenes, making me laugh, or for being a friend of the reviewer. Plus, it makes the score add up to 100.

Q: So what do the categories mean?

A: The scores in each category rate how well the author achieved what he attempted. It's not an attempt to set the book against some universal standard, but how well it did against books from a similar genre. It's not an attempt to compare fantasy novels with literary novels, or satire with experiment books. Under this system, it's possible for a romance to achieve a high score because it is the best book among romances, not against another genre.

Here are the categories

Genre rates how well the novel fulfilled the expectations of its genre. A reader picks up a mystery novel expecting to be mystified; a romance for the love story; a literary for whatever the author's trying to do in that genre.

Realism tries to answer the question: does the novel offer enough of a sense of place, history and people that the narration demands? A thriller that's intended to jolt the reader with action and exciting plot twists does not require as much detailed description as a historical novel.

Character like the Realism score, asks not just how well are the characters developed, but how well it describes what we need to know about them. Should a satiricial novel require the depth of characterization that a personality study? Not necessarily.

Setting rates the vividness of the locations against the demands of the story.

Theme should be self-explanatory.

Style judges how well the author told the story.

Enjoy this post? Share it with others.

Bookmark on del.icio.us Bookmark on Digg Bookmark on Facebook Bookmark on Fark Bookmark on Google Bookmarks Bookmark on NewsVine Bookmark on Reddit Bookmark on Slashdot Bookmark on StumbleUpon Bookmark on Technorati Bookmark on Windows Live Bookmark on YahooMyWeb

0 comments about

'Review FAQ'

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.

Copyright 2010 by Bill Peschel
Powered by Expression Engine